Fresh Batch #195: Ophiolatria & Cyclopians

How the Name Jesus Was Actually Used from the 4th Century BC Through the 1st Century AD; Amonian Radicals OB, OUB, PYTHO

Jacob Bryant wrote (Analysis of Ancient Mythology, Vol. 1. pp. 473-4.), “It may seem extraordinary, that the worship of the serpent should have ever been introduced into the world: and it must appear still more remarkable, that it should almost universally have prevailed.

“And they refer these mysteries to the mother of the gods. And along with each of those whom you esteem gods there is painted a serpent, a great symbol and mystery.”—Justin Martyr (Apol. L. 1. c. 27.)

Source

“As mankind are said to have been ruined through the influence of this being, we could little expect that it would, of all other objects, have been adopted, as the most sacred and salutary symbol; and rendered the chief object of adoration. (Οφεις–τιμασθαι ισχυρως. Serpents—to be highly esteemed. Philarchus apud Ælian: de Animal. L. 17. c. 5. Vol. 1.) Yet so we find it to have been. In most of the ancient rites there is some allusion to the serpent. (Σημειον Οργιων Βακχικων Οφις εστι τετελεσμενος. The serpent signified that the Bacchic Orgies were accomplished. Clemens Alexand. Cohort. p. 11. See Augustinus de Civitate Dei. L. 3. c. 12. and L. 18. c. 15.) I have taken notice, that in the Orgies of Bacchus the persons, who partook in the ceremony, used to carry serpents in their hands, and with horrid screams call upon Eva, Eva.”

This is important. Orgies signified Labors back then. Thus, the Orgies of Bacchus are similar in concept to the Labors of Hercules. Also, Eva (הוה; Eve) is the name of Jove (יהוה; ieve; Yo-vuh) without the yod. So one can see how this mysterious Eva is also Jove, which are appellations of the sun, which is Bacchus, Hercules, and all the rest. The sun is a creation or mediator of God and produces light and life. It was signified by serpents, which represent time, the cosmos, and the cycles of Nature.

Bryant continued (Ib. p. 474.), “They were often crowned with serpents, and still made the same frantic exclamation. (Ενεστεμμενοι τοις οφεσιν. Crowned the serpent. Clemens above.) One part of the mysterious rites of Jupiter Sabazius was to let a snake slip down the bosom of the person to be initiated, which was taken out below. (Arnobius. L. 5. p. 171.) These ceremonies, and this symbolic worship began among the Magi, who were the sons of Chus: and by them they were propagated in various parts.”

Epiphanius and Clemens believed Eva signified the mother of the gods, hence the citation above. However, this is from the Christian context and belief in Eve, regarding the Adam and Eve story. However, the writings of Maximus Tyrius indicate that princes in India worshiped Bacchus in the form of a serpent under the name of Eve, so Bryant’s suspicion is probably more likely, that Eva was same as Eph, Epha, Opha, which the Greeks rendered as Ophis, signifying a serpent.

Bryant wrote (Ib. p. 475.), “Olympias, the mother of Alexander, was very fond of these Orgies, in which the serpent was introduced. (Plutarch. Alexander. p. 665.) Plutarch mentions, that rites of this sort were practised by the Edonian women near mount Hæmus in Thrace; and carried on to a degree of madness. Olympias copied them closely in all their frantic manœuvres. She used to be followed with many attendants, who had each a thyrsus with serpents twined round it. They had also snakes in their hair, and in the chaplets, which they wore; so that they made a most fearful appearance. Their cries were very shocking: and the whole was attended with a continual repetition of the words, Evoe, Saboe, Hues Attes, Attes Hues, which were titls of the God Dionusus (the sun). He was perculiarly named Ύης (Hues); and his priests were the Hyades, and Hyantes. He was likewise styled Evas. Ευας ό Διονυσος. (Hesych.)”

Source

Source

Demosthenes allegedly lived circa 384 BC, but I’d emphasize allegedly, given the amount of fraud and forgery we’ve covered. If the writing attributed to him can be depended on, or even if the writing dates closer to the beginning of the Common Era, such as its use by authors like Strabo, it predates the earliest accounts of Jesus, yet essentially is the name of Jesus prior to the addition of the Latin termination —us. For someone in my position, this isn’t controversial because it’s an obvious succession of the universal system of priestcraft, which my work demonstrates. But to those who’ve confused or accepted this universal system as historical accounts, rather than recognize its true purpose, then it can be paradigm-shifting to learn these details. This is the bombshell which I’ve covered from the very first Spirit Whirled book. Through ioticism and Latinization, Ύης, YES, which looks like ΥΗΣ (YHS) in Greek, or ύης when lowercase, became ΙΗΣ, or IHS, or Ἰησ— when lowercase, the root of Jesus (Ἰησοῦς; ΙΗΣΟΥΣ) and the symbol of the Jesuits, which is really encoding the sun, or Bacchus/Dionysus. (The letters H and E are interchangeable in older languages.)

This is problematic because male names don’t terminate like this (—ους) in Greek. It indicates a Latin mindset created the archetype with the male termination of the name ending in —us, i.e., Marcus. If the name were actual Greek, it’d terminate in —os, —ou, or —on, (Iesos, Iesou, Ieson) like Kyros, Kyrou, and Kyron, as can be seen the following (Κυρος, Κυρου, Κυρον), which are all titles ascribed to Jesus in the New Testament, and which Cyrus is a Latinization of, the very name that the Persians ascribed to the sun, as accounted for by Plutarch in the 1st Century AD, when this would be most significant. Thus, you can see how in a correct termination, Ieson would be Jason, thus making Jesus and Jason variations of the same name. Jason and the Argonauts—Jesus and the Apostles.

Source

The same goes for the Greek rendering of the word Christian in the NT. Χριστιανος is a Greek root word (Χρης; Chres, ioticized as Chris; also rendered Χρηστ) with the addition of the Greek —ος or Latin —us termination, conceded by the highest authorities: Chrest or Christ; the sigma-tau was interchangeable with the sigma alone, still heard in the way we pronounce words like listen, epistle, mistle-toe, and even Christmas. Archbishop Richard Trench admitted (On the Study of Words), “It is curious too that, although a Greek word and coined in a Greek city, the termination is Latin. Christianos is formed on the model of Romanus, Albanus, Pompeianus, and the like.”

For those of you interested in learning more, invest in the Spirit Whirled series, then The Real Universal Empire.

Become a member to access the rest of this article.