Inner Whirled | Episode 10

Abraham

Robert Taylor wrote (Astr. Lect. p. 188, 189.), “There is a very curious, but most essentially important variation of the name of this most extraordinary personage, with whom I am now to bring you acquainted.

“From the eleventh chapter of this ancient Chaldean Mythos, called the book of Genesis, in which he is first mentioned as Abram, the Son of Terah, in the land of his nativity in Ur of the Chaldees (which demonstrates the Chaldean origin of his whole story), he is called אברם (Ab-ram). But in the 17th chapter, God changes his name from אברם into אברהם (literally abrem or avrem, but Taylor has it as Ouvroime); assigning the never-to-be-forgotten reason for that change, ‘Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee.’

“This passage, alone, is fatal to the pretense of the people called Jews, or of any other particular nation, to be called the descendants or children of Abraham; since he was not to be the founder of a nation, or any peculiar people,—but ‘a father of many nations;’ the common progenitor of all the families of the earth.

“A similar change of name, and for a similar reason, is announced with respect to Sarah, the wife of Abraham, in the 15th verse of this chapter:—

‘And God said unto Abraham, as for —שרי (sri, which could quite literally be Siri or Ceres)—thy wife, thou shalt not call her name שרי, but שרה (sre) shall her name be: and she shall be a mother of nations; kings of people shall be of her.’

“The name Sair, afterwards ill pronounced and ill written Shari or Shira, was the name which the ancient Arabians originally gave to the star Sirius (Sir William Drummond’s Origines, Vol. III., p. 460.); and literally rendered, signifies a star. If then, we chose to suppose the highest respect to be due to this Book of Genesis, it is an evident outrage against it, and an egregious vanity and impudence, either to pretend or to admit the pretension of any particular nation or people upon earth to be peculiarly, or in any exclusive or distinguished sense, the descendants or race of this Universal Father and Universal Mother of mankind.

Source

“Nor is there a single passage of either the Old or the New Testament, that recognizes or countenances a national or political claim of any race or community of men, that ever were upon earth, to be related to these entities, any more or any nearer than any other people. But contrarywise, the relation to Abraham and Sarah is, in every instance in which it is alluded to, spoken of exclusively as a moral, and not as a national, political, or hereditary relationship. There are no people on earth,—there never was a single individual of the human race, in any literal sense, descended from Abraham and Sarah, any more than there were ever any literal children of the Devil, or Sons of Belial.”

Ash-Shira could easily be Ash (אש: Esh) and Sur (Phoenician TSR: 𐤑𐤓) or Surya (Sanskrit), the Fire God, or Lord of Fire. Together is Asher. It is the exact same encode as Assyria (Hebrew: ASUR), the Aesir (Norse: Gods, also written ASUR in Elder Futhark), Aesar (Etrusco-Phoenicians and Irish: God), etc.

Abram, meaning most high, is the son of Terah, which is earth, whose nativity is Ur, which is light. Regardless of interpretation, an honest man must concede this is astronomical. Taylor wrote (Ib. p. 196.), “The Chasdim, translated the Chaldees, not being a national name, but a professional one; signifying the same as the magicians, the astrologers, the soothsayers, with which synonymous terms it is continually associated.”

The root of Abraham is Avre or Abre, which I suspect is the reason for the malformed transliteration of Hebrew, which looks like Obri or Ovri (עברי), yet is pronounced eve-ree. Keep in mind that Eve signifies life and also forms the name of Tetragrammaton (Jehovah; IEVE, JEWE, YHWH, JHVH, Jove) minus the yod. So here we have life, Hebrew, Jove, and Abram philologically linked. Also recall the first two letters of Tetragrammaton (Yod-Heh) signifying God (Jah, Ya). This is the IH (IE, epithet for Apollo) of the Greeks and IU/IO (Jove; Jupiter) of the Romans.

Taylor also touched upon a grammatical situation regarding this particular language, or system, which makes it impossible to translate without taking liberties. It is something that all serious researchers must account for. He wrote (Ib. pp. 189, 190.), “There never was any idiom of speech in the world, so common and universal as that, by which, in the Hebrew and all oriental languages, any thing which bore a resemblance to some other thing, or stood in some close association of comparison with it, was called the son of that thing, or its daughter.”

Necessity is the mother of invention. It motivates innovation. Every nation has its idioms. The mother of idiots is always pregnant (La mamma degli idioti é sempre incinta). There is a never-ending amount of idiots in this world. There is no literal mother. This should be a monumental key for those of you looking for authentic ways to interpret mythological stories, or confirm others’ interpretations.

He continued (Ib. p. 190.), “These languages had no adjectives, and were therefore driven on a necessity of expressing the qualities of nouns, by the use of other nouns, supposed to bear a relation to them; and hence, they could not designate a righteous man, but as the son of something or somebody that had been supposed to possess a character similar to that which they would ascribe to him. The ‘generation of the faithful,’ and the ‘children of the wicked one,’ were the necessary periphrases to express the characters of persons who were themselves faithful or wicked; but not at all implying the real existence of the faithful and the wicked, whose generation or children they were said to be.”

Thus all the mythological heroes who were described as the son of God take a new meaning.

He continued (Ib. pp. 190, 191.), “Thus we read continually such figures as—‘the Sons of Eli, were Sons of Belial’—that is, they were bad men: not literally Sons of Belial, nor had any such person as Belial rally existed. They were only like to what was adverse or opposed. So, when Saul would call his son perverse and rebellious, he could find no other phrase for that sense, than ‘Thou son of the perverse rebellious woman;’ nothing being further from the meaning, than any idea of his really being the son of any such woman, or any woman of such a character having a real existence.

“Nor is any real existence implied, in the abstractions which are hieroglyphed under the names of Abraham and Sarah; nor any real physical descent or continuation implied in that orientalism of speech, whereby good and virtuous persons are called the children, or sons and daughters of Abraham and Sarah. The relationship is always moral,—never national or personal. It was those only who resembled the character attributed to Abraham, or who studied or understood the astronomical science, veiled under the names and allegorical histories of Abraham, as in that noble challenge of the evangelical prophet, ‘Hearken to me ye that follow after righteousness, ye that seek the Lord, look unto the rock whence ye are hewn, and to the hole of the pit whence ye are digged. Look unto Abraham, your father, and unto Sarah, that bare you.’

All of this matches astronomical drama playing out during the reckoning of the year at midnight on the 25th of December when the system came to fruition.

“As St. Paul, in his Epistle to the Romans (who certainly were not Jews nor of Jewish extraction), emphatically calls Abraham, ‘the Father of us all;’ grounding his argument on the text, ‘as it is written, I have made thee a Father of many nations.’ Romans iv. 17. And in his Epistle to the Greeks of Galatia, he as expressly designates Sarah, the wife of Abraham, ‘the mother of us all.’

Source

The fact that pollon means of many, gives insight into Apollon, which could signify without many, the absence of many, or in other words: One, hence Sol Invictus, the Invincible Sun, the Alone One: Solus.

And what is Sol? Literally, it is a Plate. A round fiery plate, known as both the One, the Son of God, and the Sun, whose symbol of perfection is a sphere or circle. Hopefully you appreciate my concerns regarding a writer named Plato, or Sol-O.

Taylor continued (Ib. pp. 192, 193.), “Our inquiry is, Who was Abraham? And it is of singular importance to observe, that he is designated the Son of Terah (Terra), and of Ur of the Chaldees. His story, then, is not Jewish, not Hebrew; not of Palestine, of Judea or of Egypt, but of Chaldea,—not possibly, therefore, of the composition of any such person, as the supposed Moses must be supposed to be,—not possibly original in any Hebrew exhibition of it; but necessarily derived to the Hebrew, Syriac, Phœnician, or Greek versions, from its native Chaldea.

“To Chaldea, then, and Chaldaic records, we must necessarily turn for the solution of our inquiries, as to the first types of this Chaldaic person, or personification of Abram, the son of Terah, of Ur of the Chaldees.”

Unfortunately there is not much evidence regarding the history of Chaldea. Taylor acknowledges that we must rely on fragments of Greek writers such as Abydenus, Apollodorus, Alexander Polyhistor, and Berosus, a priest of Belus (which is the sun), who may have existed in location we call Babylon, an alleged capital of the Chaldean empire, or Rome if you acknowledge that Rome was called Babylon in the Bible. I don’t think any of it is reliable, and I am now of the opinion that there is a relationship between the ancient Scots, called Caledonians by Romans, and the Chaldeans. But this could be anecdotal. What’s not anecdotal is the following time frame corresponding to the degrees of the Zodiac. Taylor wrote (Ib. pp. 193, 194.), “As Abydenus and Berosus speak of regularly reigning sovereigns, through a period of ten sari (which is literally the name of Sarah: Sri, a plural for Saros, which is Sar if the termination is removed), which is 36,000 years, and Apollodorus, of dynasties continued through four times that period, which is 144,000 years: It never being forgotten, that whatever we may think of such dates, resting on such authorities, compared to our Mosaic accounts, which reckon the world but as 6,000 years old, the ancient Chaldee astronomers are proved to have been acquainted with the very highest discoveries of astronomical science, and to have calculated the measure of time, to the precision of the setting of a chronometer; while the whole world besides, were as ignorant as religious people in all the world have ever been.

“The prophet Isaiah speaks of ‘Babylon, the glory of Kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldean excellence.’ Nor was it till after the return of the Jewish people from their Babylonish captivity, that the name of Abraham, or any portion of the Chaldaic story, was found in books that claimed a Jewish origin. The demonstration, then, is complete: it is a plagiarism.

“They stole it from their masters, the Chaldeans; and, without caring to acquaint themselves with the astronomical significancy, they adopted the veil of an occult science, as a tissue of real history, and pretended that history was peculiarly their own.”

Isaiah is literally Jesus-God (Isa-Jah), or Savior God, hence the Arabic word for Jesus Christ being Isa. Babylon, or Bab-El-On, is literally Father-God-Sun, or if you take byl (בעל; bol), you have Ba-Bol-On, which is Father-Lord-Sun. His glory of the Kingdoms being the light of the sun in each of the signs of the Zodiac as he passes through them. The Jews, or gods, in bondage would be the stars blotted out by the light of the sun, only free at night. I am of the opinion that the Chaldeans were a priest class, not a race, in a portion of the world that used to be India prior to Persian takeover. I don’t accept the idea that people in that part of the world enslaved Mesopotamians or Eastern Europeans, but it’s a position that I can change in light of better evidence.

That being said, this is getting too advanced for the free portion. If any of this is foreign to you, bring yourself up to speed with the Spirit Whirled series and then The Real Universal Empire.

Become a member to access the rest of this podcast and show notes.